The two films I chose to watch for this assignment were the Artist and the Rink, which is a Charlie Chaplin film. These movies come from two entirely different eras, with the Artist winning several awards at the 2012 Academy Awards, and the Rink being released in 1916. First off, the era in which each film was shot is the greatest differing factor. Within this there lie many a bevy of changes, one of the most remarkable are the cameras used. The cameras used in the Charlie Chaplin movies are very much grainier and less defined, as is expected of equipment used when film was still being pioneered. The black and whites of more recent films just look so much polished and refined. Another quality issue is the fact that the audio is incredibly rough and coarse, with microphones still not being properly developed at the time.
Another major difference between the two is the type of camera cuts and techniques used between the two. The Artist generally employed more elegant cuts, with panning and dollying used to create better perspectives. The Rink used more staging shots, with the camera set at one angle and kept their for a length of time while the actors acted out in front of it. The Rink also used mainly jump cuts without transitions really because video editing tools and knowledge had evolved quite yet.
There were two main similarities I noticed were the music choices and the type of acting in each. Each consisted of your typical thought for silent films, and since the Artist focused on the relationship between the main man and a young dancer. The Charlie Chaplin film was a comedy that used similar upbeat, time-period music. The acting styles were also slightly over dramatized in my opinion, which was probably necessary as it is a silent film. Facial reactions were rather drawn out and emphasized in both films.